The Uncomfortable Truth About Period Dramas’ Unrealistic Beauty Standards

In recent years, period dramas have become increasingly known for revising history and pushing the boundaries of storytelling. Director Emerald Fennell’s adaptation of Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights is a prime example. While the film has received praise for its bold approach, one aspect that has garnered significant attention is the decision not to show Margot Robbie’s character, Cathy, with her natural body hair.

Fennell’s regret over this omission highlights a broader issue within the industry: the perpetuation of unrealistic beauty standards in period dramas. Women in these films are often depicted as completely hairless, even in situations where it would have been implausible for them to shave regularly. This creates an unattainable and damaging expectation for audiences.

The emphasis on physical appearance in period dramas is driven by the industry’s desire to create a specific aesthetic. Producers often strive to evoke a nostalgic or romanticized atmosphere, which can lead to the erasure of real-life details that would have been present during the time period being depicted. In this case, Fennell’s decision to shave Robbie’s body hair was likely made in an effort to conform to these expectations.

The absence of realistic depictions of female bodies in period dramas perpetuates unrealistic beauty standards and contributes to body dissatisfaction among women and girls watching these films. Moreover, the predominantly white cast found in many period dramas reinforces the idea that only certain types of bodies are desirable.

Fennell’s comments suggest a desire to create something more authentic and true to the spirit of Brontë’s novel, but her regret over omitting Robbie’s body hair from the final cut indicates that there is still work to be done. The industry’s fixation on creating a polished and aesthetically pleasing product has led to a lack of authenticity in period dramas.

This issue is not limited to Fennell’s film; many other adaptations have been criticized for their creative liberties and anachronisms. The pressure to conform to certain expectations can result in the watering down of historical accuracy, which ultimately detracts from the storytelling. Fennell’s comments also provide insight into the industry’s culture, where there is often a push to produce a certain type of product.

Fennell has taken time off from film-making to focus on her personal life, and it will be interesting to see if she returns with the same level of boldness and willingness to challenge conventions. The industry could benefit from more directors who are willing to take risks and push boundaries in their storytelling.